Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -Excel Wealth Summit
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
View
Date:2025-04-13 06:23:22
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (973)
Related
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- The improbable fame of a hijab-wearing teen rapper from a poor neighborhood in Mumbai
- Jamil was struggling after his daughter had a stroke. Then a doctor pulled up a chair
- Daniel Day-Lewis Looks Unrecognizable in First Public Sighting in 4 Years
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Joy-Anna Duggar Gives Birth, Welcomes New Baby With Austin Forsyth
- We’re Investigating Heat Deaths and Illnesses in the Military. Tell Us Your Story.
- This Week in Clean Economy: Northeast States Bucking Carbon Emissions Trend
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Climate Change Is Shifting Europe’s Flood Patterns, and These Regions Are Feeling the Consequences
Ranking
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- 'Ghost villages' of the Himalayas foreshadow a changing India
- Flood Risks from All Sides: Barry’s Triple Whammy in Louisiana
- Clinics offering abortions face a rise in threats, violence and legal battles
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Remember When Pippa Middleton Had a Wedding Fit for a Princess?
- 4 tips for saying goodbye to someone you love
- As states start to get opioid settlement cash, few are sharing how they spend it
Recommendation
Sam Taylor
A new flu is spilling over from cows to people in the U.S. How worried should we be?
With Greenland’s Extreme Melting, a New Risk Grows: Ice Slabs That Worsen Runoff
This GOP member is urging for action on gun control and abortion rights
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
When homelessness and mental illness overlap, is forced treatment compassionate?
Here's what really happened during the abortion drug's approval 23 years ago
The big squeeze: ACA health insurance has lots of customers, small networks